Home New Cases JD Supra: “Court Sides With Minority View Concluding Intervention Under Section 1109(b) Does Not Apply to Adversary Proceedings”*

New Cases

July 5, 2022 admin 0

JD Supra: “Court Sides With Minority View Concluding Intervention Under Section 1109(b) Does Not Apply to Adversary Proceedings”*

0 0

June 29, 2022 – JD Supra: “Court Sides With Minority View Concluding Intervention Under Section 1109(b) Does Not Apply to Adversary Proceedings” (Author: Kelly Porcelli)

https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/court-sides-with-minority-view-8270571/

*Onebowlinggreen.com posts articles for the convenience of our subscribers. Onebowlinggreen.com does not endorse the contents of articles.

(1)

Consumer Advocacy Center Trustee Seeks to Recover Fraudulent Transfers Worth $4.8M From The Brea Financial Group, LLC, Alleging Student Loan Fraud
A BPO company Inculpates Ivy Technology for Alleged Breach of Contract and Improper Set-off, Seeks Immediate Turnover of Money
MBM Sand Company Urges Court to Rule in its Favor, Says Debt Were Wrongfully Owed to the Debtor
A Florida Based Investment Management Firm Sues a Real Estate Advisory Firm and its Managing Partners for Return of Alleged Fraudulent Transfers

0 0

previous Court Throws Out Creditors’ DIP Breach of Fiduciary Claims

next Gentry Locke: “Maximizing Defenses Against Preference Claims in Your Customer’s Bankruptcy”*

Headline

In this video, bankruptcy lawyer, Roland Gary Jones, Esq., discusses the claw-back issues pertaining to Ponzi bankruptcies. Part 1 of the video discusses the claw-back theory in Ponzi bankruptcy actions initiated against the creditors of the debtor and the issues surrounding the applicable defenses to such actions.

November 11, 2021

Ponzi Clawback Rant Part 2

In this video, bankruptcy lawyer, Roland Gary Jones, Esq., discusses the claw-back issues pertaining to Ponzi bankruptcies. Part 2 of the video discusses the law pertaining to the theory of Ponzi presumption and how the law affects the creditors of the debtor.

November 10, 2021

Jones & Associates

JD Supra: “Court Sides With Minority View Concluding Intervention Under Section 1109(b) Does Not Apply to Adversary Proceedings”*

Share this video

Jones & Associates

JD Supra: “Court Sides With Minority View Concluding Intervention Under Section 1109(b) Does Not Apply to Adversary Proceedings”*

Related posts:

Share this video

Enter your email and press subscribe (function() { window.mc4wp = window.mc4wp || { listeners: [], forms: { on: function(evt, cb) { window.mc4wp.listeners.push( { event : evt, callback: cb } ); } } } })(); Leave this field empty if you're human:

Enter your email and press subscribe (function() { window.mc4wp = window.mc4wp || { listeners: [], forms: { on: function(evt, cb) { window.mc4wp.listeners.push( { event : evt, callback: cb } ); } } } })(); Leave this field empty if you're human:

Enter your email and press subscribe

Enter your email and press subscribe