Colbert v. Littman (In re Wagenknecht)
0
0
A trustee could not avoid and recover payment made to a law firm as a preferential transfer because the debtor did not exercise control or dominion over the payment to the law firm. Since, the debtor’s mother made a direct payment to the debtor’s creditors from an account over which the debtor had no interest or control, the the payment did not constitute a "transfer of an interest of the debtor in property" under section 547(b)
Full title: Colbert v. Littman (In re Wagenknecht), 971 F.3d 1209, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 26790, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P83,561, 2020 WL 4930035
Court: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
Date published: Aug. 24, 2020
Related posts:
- LaMonica v. Harrah’s Atl. City Operating Co. (In re JVJ Pharmacy)
- Nebraska Court Avoids Perfection of the Security Interest on the Debtor’s Undivided Half-Interest as a Preference
- Gould vs. Falcon Strategic Partners IV, LP (In re Integrity Directional Servs, LLC)
- A New York Bankruptcy Court Denies Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss Based on Improper Venue Under § 1409 and Under § 547