Jones & Associates

J&A Prevails with Preference Case Dismissal Arguing Lack of Antecedent Debt

June 11, 2021 admin

264

The Debtors collectively operated a nursery and was one of the nation’s largest wholesale growers and distributors of container-grown shrubs, trees, perennials, roses, and groundcovers.

J&A’s Assumption of Contract Assertion Defeats Preference Clawback Attempt

June 3, 2021 admin

150

The Debtors operated as a company engaged in the exploration and production of oil and gas in the United States.

J&A Terminates Trustee Case With Winning Ordinary Course Brief

June 2, 2021 admin

102

The Debtors are manufacturers of automotive acoustical services including reclaimed cotton acoustical insulation, polypropylene splash shields and fender insulators, and resin-free mouldable acoustical insulators.

Client Pays Zero With Jones & Associates’ Creative Incohate Lien Defense

June 1, 2021 admin

282

The Debtor is a company engaged in the exploration and production of oil and gas in the United States.

Base Period Comparison Results in Complete Dismissal For Jones & Associates Client

May 30, 2021 admin

106

The Debtors were engaged in the business of manufacturing and distributing soft surface floor covering based in Georgia. The Defendant, our client, is a not-for-profit shippers association based in Minnesota. The Defendant provided freight services to the Debtors.

Payments Under Contract Terms Deemed Ordinary, Plaintiff Dismissed Case For No Payment

May 30, 2021 admin

105

The Debtor is a company engaged in the business of operating, servicing and maintaining or drilling oil and gas wells and pipeline systems on a contract basis and in the course of such operation regularly and customarily enters into contracts with independent contractors for the performance of service relating thereto.

Difference of 1.22 Days Between Preference & Pre-Preference Period Transactions is Ordinary, Case Dismissed For No Payment

May 22, 2021 admin

The Debtor is a flooring manufacturing company based in Georgia. Specifically, the Debtor is engaged in the business of manufacturing and distributing soft surface floor covering. The Defendant, our client, is a Kansas company providing freight services.

Successfully Established That Preference Period Range Fell Within The Base Period Range of Payments

May 21, 2021 admin

170

The Debtors are headquartered in Lacombe, Louisiana and are in the business of providing healthcare services.

No Negligent Misrepresentation, Defendant Did Not Supply False Information, Case Dismissed For No Payment

May 15, 2021 admin

157

Debtor was a company engaged in the business of purchasing and administering life insurance policies held by persons who were thought to be terminally ill. The Defendant, our client, had entered into a contract with the Debtor as one of its licensees.

Analysis Showed That Preference Payments Almost Copied The Historical Payments in One-Year Look Back

May 3, 2021 admin

The Debtor was a major resin distributor and a reseller. Defendant, our client, is a logistics company that provided trucking and warehouse services to the Debtor which included holding, sorting, and storage of the Debtor’s products.

CASE STUDIES