Jones & Associates

Jones & Associates’ Subsequent New Value Argument Entirely Wipes Out Plaintiff’s Preference Clawback, Defendant Pays Nothing

November 30, 2021 admin

Debtor was a New Hampshire based technology company producing innovative crystal growth equipment for the global electronics, solar, and LED industries.

Difference of 1.2 Days in The Payment Averages Resulted in Dismissal of The Preference Claim For No Payment

November 29, 2021 admin

Debtors were engaged in manufacturing and distributing soft surface floor covering in Georgia. Defendant, our client, is a not-for-profit company based in Kansas and provided freight services to the Debtors.

J&A’s Affirmative Defenses To Trustee’s Clawback Claims Lead To a Dismissal With No Payment

November 25, 2021 admin

Debtors were a leading food and beverage company. Our client, the Defendant, is a Miami-based company that provided consulting and advisory services to the Debtors.

Trustee’s Clawback Attempt Pales in Front of J&A’s Affirmative Defenses; Client Pays Zero

November 24, 2021 admin

Debtors were the largest processor and direct-to-store distributor of fresh fluid milk and other dairy and dairy case products in the United States. The Defendant, our client, handcrafts organic dairy products using North Carolina milk and sold crème fraiche to the Debtors.

Trustee Dismisses Clawback Claims After J&A Proves That Transfers Were Identical To Pre-Preference Transfers

November 23, 2021 admin

185

The Debtors manufactured, marketed, and distributed a wide variety of branded and private label dairy and dairy case products across the United States. The Defendant is a Tennessee-based company that provided transportation services between the Debtors' production, cold storage, and distribution centers.

J&A’s Ordinary Course of Business Defense Hits The Trustee’s Clawback Claims Out of The Park

November 19, 2021 admin

Debtors were a leading food and beverage company and the largest processor and direct-to-store distributor of fresh milk fluid and other dairy and dairy case products across the United States.

Trustee Dismisses Fraudulent Conveyance Clawback Based on J&A’s Reasonably Equivalent Value Argument

June 13, 2021 admin

988

The Debtors are a company incorporated in Guadalupe, Arizona and they own and operate restaurants.

J&A Prevails with Preference Case Dismissal Arguing Lack of Antecedent Debt

June 11, 2021 admin

271

The Debtors collectively operated a nursery and was one of the nation’s largest wholesale growers and distributors of container-grown shrubs, trees, perennials, roses, and groundcovers.

J&A’s Assumption of Contract Assertion Defeats Preference Clawback Attempt

June 3, 2021 admin

152

The Debtors operated as a company engaged in the exploration and production of oil and gas in the United States.

J&A Terminates Trustee Case With Winning Ordinary Course Brief

June 2, 2021 admin

114

The Debtors are manufacturers of automotive acoustical services including reclaimed cotton acoustical insulation, polypropylene splash shields and fender insulators, and resin-free mouldable acoustical insulators.

Client Pays Zero With Jones & Associates’ Creative Incohate Lien Defense

June 1, 2021 admin

289

The Debtor is a company engaged in the exploration and production of oil and gas in the United States.

Base Period Comparison Results in Complete Dismissal For Jones & Associates Client

May 30, 2021 admin

110

The Debtors were engaged in the business of manufacturing and distributing soft surface floor covering based in Georgia. The Defendant, our client, is a not-for-profit shippers association based in Minnesota. The Defendant provided freight services to the Debtors.

Payments Under Contract Terms Deemed Ordinary, Plaintiff Dismissed Case For No Payment

May 30, 2021 admin

112

The Debtor is a company engaged in the business of operating, servicing and maintaining or drilling oil and gas wells and pipeline systems on a contract basis and in the course of such operation regularly and customarily enters into contracts with independent contractors for the performance of service relating thereto.

Difference of 1.22 Days Between Preference & Pre-Preference Period Transactions is Ordinary, Case Dismissed For No Payment

May 22, 2021 admin

The Debtor is a flooring manufacturing company based in Georgia. Specifically, the Debtor is engaged in the business of manufacturing and distributing soft surface floor covering. The Defendant, our client, is a Kansas company providing freight services.

Successfully Established That Preference Period Range Fell Within The Base Period Range of Payments

May 21, 2021 admin

172

The Debtors are headquartered in Lacombe, Louisiana and are in the business of providing healthcare services.

CASE STUDIES