Debtor Did Receive Reasonably Equivalent Value in Exchange for the Rental Payments, Case Dismissed For No Payment
The Debtors are a company incorporated in Guadalupe, Arizona and they own and operate restaurants.
Alleged Transfers Were Pre-Payments, No Antecedent Debt Arose Between the Parties, Payments Not Preferential in Nature
The Debtors collectively operated a nursery and was one of the nation’s largest wholesale growers and distributors of container-grown shrubs, trees, perennials, roses, and groundcovers.
Precedents Stipulate That a Trustee Cannot Avoid Transfers From Contracts Assumed By a Debtor Post-Petition
The Debtors operated as a company engaged in the exploration and production of oil and gas in the United States.
Incohate Lien Defense Enabled Defendant To Retain Alleged Preferences Despite a Clawback Action
The Debtor is a company engaged in the exploration and production of oil and gas in the United States.
Consistency of Transactions Revealed Nothing Unusual During Preference & Pre-Preference Period
The Debtors are manufacturers of automotive acoustical services including reclaimed cotton acoustical insulation, polypropylene splash shields and fender insulators, and resin-free mouldable acoustical insulators.
Debtor Did Not Pay as Per Agreed Payment Terms, Case Still Dismissed For No Payment
The Debtors were engaged in the business of manufacturing and distributing soft surface floor covering based in Georgia. The Defendant, our client, is a not-for-profit shippers association based in Minnesota. The Defendant provided freight services to the Debtors.
Payments Under Contract Terms Deemed Ordinary, Plaintiff Dismissed Case For No Payment
The Debtor is a company engaged in the business of operating, servicing and maintaining or drilling oil and gas wells and pipeline systems on a contract basis and in the course of such operation regularly and customarily enters into contracts with independent contractors for the performance of service relating thereto.
Difference of 1.22 Days Between Preference & Pre-Preference Period Transactions is Ordinary, Case Dismissed For No Payment
The Debtor is a flooring manufacturing company based in Georgia. Specifically, the Debtor is engaged in the business of manufacturing and distributing soft surface floor covering. The Defendant, our client, is a Kansas company providing freight services.
Successfully Established That Preference Period Range Fell Within the Base Period Range of Payments
The Debtors are headquartered in Lacombe, Louisiana and are in the business of providing healthcare services.
No Negligent Misrepresentation, Defendant Did Not Supply False Information, Case Dismissed For No Payment
Debtor was a company engaged in the business of purchasing and administering life insurance policies held by persons who were thought to be terminally ill. The Defendant, our client, had entered into a contract with the Debtor as one of its licensees.