Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc. Targets New Batch for Clawback Actions
December 8, 2016, Delaware – The Trump Entertainment Resorts Inc. bankruptcy trustee, Nathan A. Schultz launched several lawsuits last month seeking to clawback payments made before it filed for Chapter 11 protection to entities that include Unite Here Health, Aramark Uniform and Career Apparel, LLC and utility provider Atlantic City Electric Co. The trustee is allegedly seeking to recover roughly $3 million from both Atlantic City Electric and Unite Here Health and comparatively a smaller amount of $13,000 from Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel LLC. The trustee already commenced his clawback campaign way back in September 2016, with filing approximately 100 lawsuits to recover more than $14 million. According to the court records, many of those cases have been resolved as well.
Trump Entertainment filed for Chapter 11 protection for the second time in five years in 2014. The trustee is represented by Natasha M. Songonuga of Gibbons PC, and Joseph L. Steinfeld, Jr. and Edward E. Neiger of ASK LLP. The adversary cases are Schultz v. Unite Here Health, case number 1:16-ap-51544, Schultz v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel LLC, case number 1:16-ap-51545, and Schultz v. Atlantic City Electric Co., case number 1:16-ap-51546, all in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. The bankruptcy case is In re Trump Entertainment Resorts Inc. et al., case number 1:14-bk-12103.
Security Interest Perfected Beyond 30-Days After the Debtor Received Possession Of Vehicle is a Preference
Reynard v. Bank of Am., N.A. (In re Resler), Nos. 15-00477-TLM, 15-06052-TLM, 2016 Bankr. LEXIS…Read More
Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc. Launches Clawback Campaign
Delaware, September 6, 2016 – Nathan A. Schultz, as a trustee for the bankruptcy estate…Read More
Preference Actions Filed in GT Advanced Technologies, Inc. and GT Advanced Equipment Holding LLC
October 11, 2016, New Hampshire – The estate of GT Advanced Technologies Corp. and its…Read More
Commissions Received by a Wholesale Insurance Broker are Preferences Under Sec. 547(b)
Kartzman v. Peachtree Special Risk Brokers (In re John A. Rocco Co.), Nos. 12-01269 (JKS),…Read More
Utah Court Did Not Allow a Creditor to Retain the Funds He Invested With a Non-Debtor in a Ponzi Scheme, Even When the Non-Debtor was Operating the Debtor’s Ponzi Scheme
Gillman v. Russell (In re Twin Peaks Fin. Servs.) No. 2:15-cv-00167-DN, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS…Read More