Quantum Foods – Opportunity For Leave to Amend a Complaint be Freely Given
Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors of Quantum Foods, LLC v. Indep. Purchasing Coop., Inc. (In re Quantum Foods, LLC), Nos. 14-10318 (KJC), 25), 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 2968 (U.S. Bankr. D. Del. Aug. 9, 2016)
Debtor Quantum Foods, LLC filed for voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition and the Committee was appointed which commenced an adversary proceeding against Defendant Independent Purchasing Cooperative, Inc. (IPC) to avoid and recover transfers made by Quantum Foods to IPC in the total amount of $2,223,060.65 pursuant to §§547(b) and 550 of the Bankruptcy Code. IPC filed a motion to dismiss and the Committee filed a response opposing the motion.
The Court found that the Committee’s complaint did not state sufficient facts to support the claims for avoidance and recovery of a preferential payment or for disallowance of claims because the complaint did not provide any details about the antecedent debt which the transfers satisfied such as the relationship between the parties, the identity of any contracts or agreements between the parties, or any description of the goods or services exchanged. The Court also found that although the elements of causes of action under §547(b) and §502(d) were stated in the complaint; they were only a few vague factual allegations. However, the Court still granted an opportunity to the Committee to amend its complaint and provide more specific information. The Court reasoned that a leave to amend a complaint should be freely given when justice so required.
Alabama Court Upholds “Remains Unpaid” Approach to Shield Preference Transfers While Applying Subsequent New Value Defense
Kaye v. Barber Milk, LLC (In re BFW Liquidation, LLC), Nos. 09-00634-TOM-11, 11-00062, 11-00071, 2016…Read More
Preference Actions Filed in Seal123, Inc. Bankruptcy
December 15, 2016, Delaware – Last week, Seal123, Inc. Liquidation Trust filed approximately 68 complaints…Read More
Lack of Recognition of Constructive Trust in Louisiana Precludes Judgment in Favor of Defendant
Rodney Tow Ch 7 Tr. v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (In re ATP Oil & Gas…Read More
Payments May be Ordinary, Even When the Payment Practices Differ in the Preference and Base Period, If there Is a Change in the Defendant’s Ownership
Satija v. C-T Plaster, Inc. (In re Sterry Indus.), Nos. 13-11818-TMD, 15-01108-TMD, 2016 Bankr. LEXIS…Read More
Payments Pursuant to a Garnishment Lien is Avoidable as a Preferential Transfer
Weinman v. Alt. Revenue Sys. (In re Stevens), Nos. 15-11776 HRT, 15-01340, 2016 Bankr. LEXIS…Read More