Trustee Continues to File Clawback Actions in Telexfree LLC Bankruptcy
April 1, 2016, Massachusetts – On April 13, 2014, Debtors Telexfree, LLC and its affiliates filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada. Subsequently, the cases were transferred to the District of Massachusetts. Subsequently, on June 6, 2014, Stephen B. Darr was appointed as a Chapter 7 Trustee.
As per the Order entered by the Court, the Debtors operated a massive Ponzi and pyramid scheme, which involved as many as 1,900,000 participants from multiple countries under the guise of a “multi-level marketing” company with its headquarters in Marlborough, Massachusetts. Although, the Debtors represented themselves as being in the business of selling telephone service plans that use voice over Internet (VoIP) technology, the sale of VoIP constituted only a minor portion of their business; the Debtors’ actual business was the recruitment of participants to carry out the sale of plans.
Last month, the Trustee initiated about 45 actions in the District of Massachusetts claiming that the defendants received more than they paid into Marlborough-based Telexfree between 2012 and 2014. The largest claim in the group is filed for recovery of claim amounts worth $747,973.55 and $106,416.35 against ISG Telecomm Consultants, LLC and Advent Communications Corporation respectively.
The Debtors bankruptcy cases are jointly administered under Case No. 14-40987. The cases are pending before the Honorable Judge Melvin S. Hoffman in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts. The law firm of Murphy & King Professional Corporation is acting as lead bankruptcy counsel to Telexfree, LLC (D. Mass.) in the bankruptcy cases.
Defendant Provided “Value” for the Alleged Transfer By Paying For the Parties’ Living Expenses From the Transfer
Silagy v. Schroeder (In re Schroeder), Nos. 14-62604, 16-6017, 2017 Bankr. LEXIS 420 (U.S. Bankr….Read More
Madoff Trustee Moves for Direct Appeal to Second Circuit in a Clawback Fight Against RBS
March 28, 2017, New York – On March 15, 2017, the trustee Irving Picard for…Read More
Alabama Court Upholds “Remains Unpaid” Approach to Shield Preference Transfers While Applying Subsequent New Value Defense
Kaye v. Barber Milk, LLC (In re BFW Liquidation, LLC), Nos. 09-00634-TOM-11, 11-00062, 11-00071, 2016…Read More
BAP Affirms the Ohio Court Ruling in Avoiding the Transfer as Preference Because Appellant Did not Have Valid Perfected Lien Over the Vehicles
Dymarkowski v. Savage (In re Hadley), No. 16-8010, 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 4445 (U.S. B.A.P. 6th…Read More
Texas Supreme Court: Arm’s Length Transactions Made in Ordinary Course is Reasonably Equivalent Irrespective of a Ponzi Scheme
Janvey v. Golf Channel, Inc., No. 15-0489, 2016 Tex. LEXIS 241 (Apr. 1, 2016) April…Read More