Bankrupt Lincoln Mill Seeks to Clawback $1.1M From its Vendors
Maine, August 8, 2017 – As a part of the bankruptcy process, the Lincoln Paper and Tissue mill is purportedly gearing up to reclaim money that it has already paid out to several vendors before its bankruptcy filing. The bankrupt mill allegedly plans to file $1.1 million in claims against suppliers in Maine and elsewhere that it paid before filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. The largest claim, $552,396, is against Woodland Pulp. The other creditors include Sibley Transportation, W.T. Gardner & Sons, Winn-based trucking company H.C. Haynes and the Hermon-based Pottle’s Transportation. If the mill succeeds in its effort to clawback the alleged transfers from various vendors, the money will go back into the bankruptcy estate for potential distribution among its creditors.
The debtor-in possession, Lincoln Paper and Tissue, LLC has already had already filed some of its preference claims against vendors, including the South Carolina-based Sonoco Products Co. and Houston-based Honeywell Process Solutions. Earlier this week, the mill initiated clawback lawsuits against Sibley Transportation, Inc. and Bonetti Co. Inc. The pretrial conference is scheduled for October 3, 2017, in these cases.
Two years ago, the mill filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on Sept. 28, 2015, after the explosion of a recovery boiler that curtailed the mill’s ability to process its own wood pulp to make into paper. The company employed about 170 people in the production of speciality tissue for products like party napkins and medical tissues.
Debtor Avoids Payment Made to Her Former Attorneys on Account of Legal Fees As Preference
Pantazelos v. Benjamin (In re Pantazelos), Nos. 15-bk-08916, 15-ap-00314, 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 4512 (U.S. Bankr….Read More
Madoff Renounces Defendant’s Motion to Compel Discovery in the Clawback Fight
New York, October 17, 2016 – Irving Picard, the court-appointed trustee of the liquidating Bernie…Read More
Michigan Court – Release of a Security Interest and Receipt of Payment By the Defendant is a Contemporaneous Exchange, Even though the Release Occurred Weeks Before the Payment was Made
In re Rosich, 558 B.R. 199 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2016) Defendant Christopher Rosich made a…Read More
Tax Upset Sale is Not Avoidable Under Sec. 548(a)(1)(B)(i) Because the Price Defendant Paid for the Property Constituted Reasonably Equivalent Value
Crespo v. Abijah Tafari Immanuel (In re Crespo), Nos. 14-11629REF, 14-326, 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 2073…Read More
Trustee Failed to Establish that Transfers were Made With Intent to Hinder, Delay or Defraud Creditors of Debtor
Weil v. United States (In re Tag Entm’t Corp.), Nos. 1:09-bk-26982-VK, 1:10-ap-01342-VK, 2016 Bankr. LEXIS…Read More