A New York Court Rejects Merkin’s Attempt to Avoid Trial in the Madoff Clawback
January 30, 2017, New York – In a clawback war between Madoff Trustee, Irving Picard and a financier, J Ezra Merkin, the Court sided with Picard, holding that Merkin was willfully blind to Bernie Madoff’s Ponzi scheme. Picard, the trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities (BLMIS) LLC, sued Merkin and related entities to recover preferential and fraudulent transfers from BLMIS. Merkin sought summary judgment, alleging that he would not have lost $110 million in the scam had he suspected that Madoff was running a Ponzi scheme. Merkin argued that he was duped by the fraudster like numerous other investors.
Rejecting Merkin’s motion, the Bankruptcy Judge Stuart M. Bernstein stated that the evidence presented by Picard was sufficient enough to prove that Merkin was warned as early as 1992 about the possibility of BLMIS being a Ponzi scheme and that the investment returns were too good to be true. The Court concluded that despite the knowledge that Madoff was likely operating a fraudulent enterprise, Merkin did nothing to allay his suspicions. Accordingly, the Court rejected Merkin’s attempt to avoid the trial in the clawback suit involving hundreds of millions of dollars tied to investments in the Bernie Madoff’s Ponzi scheme. The case is Picard v. Merkin et al., case number 1:08-ap-01789, in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.
Utah Court Did Not Allow a Creditor to Retain the Funds He Invested With a Non-Debtor in a Ponzi Scheme, Even When the Non-Debtor was Operating the Debtor’s Ponzi Scheme
Gillman v. Russell (In re Twin Peaks Fin. Servs.) No. 2:15-cv-00167-DN, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS…Read More
Fifth Circuit – No Ponzi Clawback From Golf Channel
Janvey v. Golf Channel, Inc., No. 13-11305, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 15407 (5th Cir. Aug….Read More
Preference Action Initiated in Plaza Healthcare Centre LLC
March 3, 2016, California – On March 4, 2014 and March 5, 2014, Plaza Healthcare…Read More
A Debtor’s Prepetition Transfer of a Farm was Fraudulent Because No Reasonably Equivalent Value was Received in Return
Zeddun v. Griswold (In re Wierzbicki), No. 16-1334, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 13688 (7th Cir….Read More
Security Interest Perfected Beyond 30-Days After the Debtor Received Possession Of Vehicle is a Preference
Reynard v. Bank of Am., N.A. (In re Resler), Nos. 15-00477-TLM, 15-06052-TLM, 2016 Bankr. LEXIS…Read More